@sidotis wrote:
I'm working as a project manager on a grant out of the University of Pennsylvania. Some of the deliverables to the funder include 9 edited volumes and one handbook (not necessarily published). I am looking for a way to keep track of the 100+ manuscripts that will be coming in and the edits from various parties. I'm wondering which would be a better system given the following:
-extensive peer review will not be part of the workflow
-we will not be posting these volumes on line; this is merely a way to keep track of our files and streamline our workflow
-we will only want to create one author submission site where, ideally, only invited, solicited contributors would submit their chapters/articles
-the 3 to 4 editors across volumes will mostly remain the same, with an additional 1 to 2 changing for each oneAre there any other factors that I'm not keeping in mind? Does anyone have any thoughts on what might make the most sense?
Many thanks for your help on this!
-Sarah
Posts: 4
Participants: 2